Select a key chapter
Looking to offer equity to your international team?
Investing in the future of a startup can come with both exhilarating opportunities and daunting caveats. For many employees, particularly those offered stock options as part of their compensation, the clock starts ticking once their service with the company ends. Post-Termination Exercise Periods (PTEPs) are the lifelines that determine whether or not an employee can bring their hard-earned benefits to fruition. However, the question stands – do PTEPs, as we know them, truly serve the employees they are designed to benefit?
Select a key chapter
Looking to offer equity to your international team?
In the realm of stock options, PTEPs represent the window of time granted to an ex-employee to purchase their vested stock at the previously designated strike price. These periods are crucial in protecting an employee's financial stake in the company post-departure. However, a closer look at the standard practice reveals significant challenges.
In the United States, a 3-month PTEP is the norm to qualify as Incentive Stock Options (ISOs) for favorable tax treatment. On one hand, this timeline provides a sense of urgency that aligns with the fast-paced startup environment. On the other, it can be a straitjacket, especially for those who need more time to gather the often sizable sum required to exercise their options.
Startup employees in countries such as France face a different standard, which, to some, may appear more generous. But the sheer complexity and lack of consistency across international borders adds a layer of confusion and inequality for a globalized workforce.
International PTEPs are complicated. We make them easier. Get started
For many grantees, stock options represent a hope for the future, a tangible stake in the company's success. However, the ability to exercise these options hinges on a fundamental issue – affordability. Short PTEPs can be financially onerous, as they require the immediate payment of the exercise price and associated taxes. The reality is that not all employees can shoulder this burden within the standard 3-month window.
In equitable terms, PTEPs can create a disparity in the ability to exercise stock options based on financial means rather than merit. This reality can be a hard pill to swallow for employees who dedicated their time and talent to a company, only to find their PTEP doesn't align with their financial readiness.
States like California, cognizant of the needs of employees, have enacted laws to extend PTEPs for those who face permanent incapacity. The progressive approach opens the door for discussions on how to better support employees in exercising their stock options without unduly burdening them.
An organization's culture is deeply influenced by its policies, and PTEPs play a critical role in shaping the narrative around an employee's value and commitment post-departure.
Policies that hinder an employee's ability to enjoy the full benefits of their stock options may inadvertently contribute to a talent drain. Star employees, feeling underappreciated, may be less inclined to stick around, impacting a startup's ability to retain its best and brightest.
Startups that recognize and address the challenges of PTEPs are in a prime position to foster employee loyalty and motivation. By extending more forgiving post-termination exercise periods, companies demonstrate they are invested in their employees' success, a crucial aspect of maintaining a vibrant startup culture.
Let us help you design better, more equitable PTEPs. Learn more
The question remains – how can startups honor the intent of PTEPs while mitigating the financial squeeze they often entail?
One potential solution is the creation of tiered PTEPs that provide more time based on an employee's tenure or the number of vested shares. This approach considers the individual's financial readiness, ensuring PTEPs are more universally accessible and less prohibitive.
An alternative that maintains the urgency of PTEPs while easing the financial burden is to structure stock option agreements with longer-term exercise windows that start from the date of grant, rather than being confined to post-termination timelines.
It's clear that the current standard for PTEPs is not a one-size-fits-all solution. Startups must advocate for a more empathetic and flexible approach that empowers employees to exercise their options without creating undue financial stress.
To ensure a brighter, more equitable future for startup employees, companies must take an active role in reevaluating and, if necessary, overhauling their PTEP structures. It's an important step in fostering an environment where employees feel their contributions are valued through policies that truly support their success.
In conclusion, PTEPs are a critical component of the employee stock option landscape, but they require thoughtful review and adjustment to be more equitable and supportive. The time to act is now, for both startups and the employees who are the heartbeat of the innovation economy. It's through open dialogue and proactive policy-making that we can ensure a fair and prosperous future for all involved.
Your journey to better, clearer international equity practices starts here